Hegel himself than about his object of analysis. Against
Hegel’s characterization of Spinoza’s work as immobile, Macherey offers a lively
alternative that upsets the accepted historical progression of philosophical
knowledge. He finds in Spinoza an immanent philosophy that is not subordinated
to the guarantee of an a priori truth.
Not simply authorizing a particular reading—a “good” Spinoza against a “bad”
Hegel—Hegel or Spinoza initiates an encounter that produces a new
understanding, a common truth that emerges in the interval that separates the
two.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0816677409/ref=pe_143810_21777940_snp_dp
No comments:
Post a Comment