- What were the significant locations for and of early modern cultures, and why?
- How might we re-think and problematise constructions of court, city (or particular cities, real and imagined), 'suburbs', 'country', the 'nation', the 'home', 'private', 'public', the marketplace, the streets, 'landscape', colonies and plantations?
- To what extent were locations conceived and constructed as gendered, rank-specific, desirable, or disgusting?
- How were all such locations experienced (and by whom), and represented in literature, art, and philosophy?
- In what ways did locations condition, inhibit, or compel political agency and cultural production and consumption?
- How were locations demarcated, policed, transgressed and jeopardised in the period?
- How was dislocation caused, theorized and represented in the period?
- What were the realities and representations of placelessness, homelessness, and dispossession?
- Where, how and why did 'mobilities' occur, and in what forms?
- How have early modern cultural products and locations - like The Globe -been relocated into and appropriated by later historical and cultural positions?
- How can modern theories of 'space', 'place', and 'placelessness' develop our understanding of early modern locations and dislocations?
Please submit 200 word abstracts for 20-25 minute papers by email to Dr Adam Hansen (adam.hansen@northumbria.ac.uk) by July 31st 2009.
No comments:
Post a Comment