* Dan Conway (Texas & AM)
* Christa Davis Acampora (Hunter College, CUNY)
* Rainer Forst (Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt)
* Paul Loeb (Puget Sound)
* Alexander Nehamas (Princeton)
* Robert Pippin (Chicago)
* Tamsin Shaw (Princeton)
* Ivan Soll (Wisconsin-Madison)
Possible topics include (but are by no means limited to):
- What ‘postmoralism’ is or means;
- What sort of alternative to ‘morality’ Nietzsche intends (e.g. perfectionist or otherwise, social or individualistic);
- Who is to bring about, or engage in, this alternative ideal;
- Nietzsche’s ideal type;
- How ‘immoral’ Nietzsche’s postmoralism is;
- Which values might survive Nietzsche's critique of morality and/or feature in his positive ideal;
- Whether Nietzsche’s postmoralism is adequately motivated by his critique of morality;
- The justificatory/metaethical status of Nietzsche’s positive normative/evaluative claims.
No comments:
Post a Comment